Activity

What would need to be “overridden” in your opinion?

Nothing apparently, i forgot that i need to add iso200 Bias frames in addition to the iso1600 bias frames…… (A warning would help though as maybe i am not the only user who forgets about this)

To add:

You can then save your calibrated rgb frames and split them directly in the r,g,b channels as an option in “save calibrated files” for further combination with your monochrome data of your new camera.

Hi @keesscherer,

This is perfectly possible in APP with your data.

(I calibrate, all my own data with flats of different iso or gain compared to the iso/gain of the light frames )

Since you indicate that you still have the light frames and flat frames, you only need to make sure that the bias pedestal is removed from both light and flat frames…[Read more]

Now back to the practical side, i have many objects imaged with the Canon 6Da in my archive and want to combine those RGB’s with new Luminance data. So i have years of iso1600 RGB data with corresponding iso200 flat frames. But there is no way that i can (re)stack this data with APP because the flat calibration is not done for these datasets. So i…[Read more]

De discussie inzake prijsstelling (misschien vraag je je af, waar bemoeit men zich mee?) is al eerder geweest. Ik hoop in ieder geval dat je de markt (en hiermee bedoel ik je potentiële klanten) gepolst hebt, gepeild en verkend hebt.

Niet alleen heeft @skysurfer gelijk in zijn stelling dat een te hoge prijs afschrikt en van de andere kant cracks…[Read more]

@skysurfer, ik kan je zeker volgen in je argumentatie.

Ik kan enkel aangeven dat ik, met heel veel plezier, enorm veel arbeid in APP heb gestoken en nog steeds doe, met als doel een programma te maken waar andere fotografen veel plezier aan zullen beleven en dat ze goed helpt om het maximale uit hun data te halen ;-)

Great, let me know if it fails again though ;-)

It seems to work now (with version 1.036.0)!

Indeed, since this is a masterdark, you are totally right ;-)

Regarding the statistics and rejection of them: The outlier rejection works a little bit differently.

Yes of course, but i will not do the calculation for the 65 frame stack by hand. The statistics for all the frames do not differ much from this “back of the envelope calculation”. The APP statistics for this master dark show a standard deviation…[Read more]

Het is denk ik niet de bedoeling om hier te gaan opschrijven hoe ik APP’s beveiliging precies kan en ga doen natuurlijk 😉 maar bedankt voor de optie @skysurfer.

Nee natuurlijk moet je dat niet doen.

Maar wat ook meespeelt bij de motivatie tot kraken van commerciele software, is de prijs. Een te hoge prijs zet ook aan tot eerder kraken. Adobe h…[Read more]

Excellent @keesscherer,

You captured quite a few of those cosmic rays ;-)

Regarding the statistics and rejection of them:

The outlier rejection works a little bit differently. An outlier rejection filter while integrating several frames, is a filter the determines the central value (average/median for example) of a pixel stack. So all pixels of…[Read more]

And some statistics, the cosmic ray has 1758 ADU, average=828 and sdev=112, so 828+3×112=1164. The 1758 gets rejected alright……Dark-cosmic-rays stats

No problem! Just some examples:Dark-cosmic-rays

Interesting to see 😉

65 darks of 600 seconds integrated (average)  and Winsorized sigma clip (WSC) 1 iteration kappa 3.

I suppose these could and should be cosminc rays indeed, they should be visible on some of the individual subs then. Interesting to see how bright they are in the frames that were hit.

Can you find a frame with such a streak?